Elearning Tech

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, 11 November 2008

Per Question Reports

Posted on 06:33 by Unknown
I received a good question from a reader:
Our school district uses Blackboard. We have recently been exploring putting more coursework online and have experimented with the Articulate line of products. Blackboard has done well for us although I am not pleased with their support of the SCORM standards.

I would like to be able to export SCORM test results by user/by question but all Blackboard seems to support is general pass/fail records. Now I can drill down to the individual results via the Bb gradebook but that just won't work for exams that are being giving to hundreds of students.

I have spent many hours researching this issue related to SCORM compliance and more specifically how to get the test results exported out of my LMS for more in depth analysis in Excel or perhaps some type of statistics package.

Would you be able to point in the right direction of a resource to help me get this done or please let me know if I am wasting my time. Perhaps the world has moved onto something else as most of the conversations online I am able to find regarding SCORM matters are 2-4 years old which in Net time as you know may as well be decades.
This brings up a bunch of initial thoughts. First, having worked on custom LMS, LCMS, Authoring projects and being pretty deeply familiar with SCORM, it's easy to blame the LMS for poor reporting on per-question reporting, but its very hard for an LMS to create generic reports that work well across all the variations that you run into. So, if the source of the statement "I'm not happy with their support for SCORM" is only the issues of reporting, that's a bit unfair.

I'd be curious what they are going to do with question level reporting. I've had a lot of clients initially say they want question level reporting. I always drill down on why they are going to do it. The most common answer is that they want to know if there are particular questions that lots of people are missing. But, in many cases (in corporate eLearning) there will be no attempt to go back and fix the course or update the test. So, if you really aren't going to do anything with the data, don't bother. It's a lot of work to get the data, look at it, decipher what it means and do something with it.

So let's get to the more helpful pieces of information. First, it appears that they are getting question level data in the LMS. That's good. And not always the case. In many cases, people will implement a SCORM course and/or LMS to only handle SCO / Module level reporting or even just course level reporting. But in this case, they have the data. Good job Articulate and Blackboard!

So, the easiest thing to do is to get a data extract from the LMS into a CSV that then you can manipulate in Excel. You should absolutely start with this to figure out what you really want to do with the data. You can do this in Blackboard by using the the "Download Results" with the "By Question and User" option. Here's a good plage showing this:

http://kb.blackboard.com/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=14551263

Once you've done this a few times and have figured out what you want your reports to do, then you can define a custom report using Crystal. Sometimes it's a bit hard to get at the data on a per-question basis, but I'm pretty sure there's a good view in Blackboard.

Let me say again, do not bother to try to define your custom report until you've done this manually across several courses/tests that will expose all the different ways that the data may come out. Then you will likely begin to appreciate the complexity. You may end up deciding to just look at the data via CSVs.

With all that, I'd love to hear your thoughts/ideas around:

* Do you use question level data / reports? If so, what do you do with it?
* Generic LMS reports that you have found useful for reporting at the question level?
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Discussion Forums for Knowledge Sharing at Capital City Bank
    Looking at Capital City Bank from the outside, I wouldn’t have expected to find a great example of social learning inside.  They are a sol...
  • Blogs, Social Networks and LinkedIn Answers
    I received a great question from someone relative to my last post - Required Reading for Training Managers where I continue to suggest the ...
  • Low-Cost Test and Quiz Tool Comparison
    I’ve recently been working with Sameer Bhatia the CEO of ProProfs as I was going through an evaluation of various online tools that support...
  • Themes Of
    This month's big question - What Did You Learn about Learning 2008 is almost an annual tradition of asking people to look back on the y...
  • How Khan Academy Nike Training Club and SparkPeople Motivate Users Behavior
    I mentioned in my post Online Systems for Behavior Change that I'm working on a very interesting project that is designed to lead to so...
  • Kids Search
    It's surprising how much I learn by watching my kids (now 13, 11 and 8) go through school today. I've mentioned before the experien...
  • Text-to-Speech Costs – Licensing and Pricing
    This post is part of the series on Text-to-Speech (TTS) for eLearning written by Dr. Joel Harband and edited by me. The other posts are: ...
  • Concept Worker
    Daniel Pink's book A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future contains a description of new age - the Conceptual Age. He...
  • Training Method Trends
    Steve Wexler who runs eLearningGuild research has been producing some really interesting information recently. All of the data comes from ...
  • eLearning Conferences 2010
    You can find other posts about eLearning Conferences in eLearning Conferences 2011 , eLearning Conferences 2010 , and eLearning Conferences ...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2012 (6)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2011 (15)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2010 (58)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (10)
  • ►  2009 (223)
    • ►  December (10)
    • ►  November (14)
    • ►  October (14)
    • ►  September (16)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (16)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (20)
    • ►  April (22)
    • ►  March (23)
    • ►  February (28)
    • ►  January (26)
  • ▼  2008 (196)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ▼  November (27)
      • CoComment Co.mments Switch
      • Conference Wiki Examples
      • Google Blog Search Problems
      • Help Create Resources for Keynote?
      • Evaluating the Performance of Knowledge Workers
      • ASTD TechKnowledge
      • No More Little Sandwiches
      • Learning Communities List
      • Real-Time Collaborative Editing
      • eLearningTechnology
      • Rapid eLearning - More Definitionn
      • What is Rapid eLearning?_12
      • PBWiki Image Overlay - Yuck
      • eLearning Learning Update
      • Get Help - Spam?
      • Manager Training Online Courses
      • Online Learning Course Design
      • Find Speaker for Local ASTD Chapter
      • Learning Trends Starts Monday
      • eNapkin
      • eLearning Research
      • New Literacies
      • Per Question Reports
      • Concept Worker
      • eLearning Learning Launched
      • Online Language Training
      • LinkedIn Facebook Twitter - Different Connection S...
    • ►  October (17)
    • ►  September (18)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  July (16)
    • ►  June (23)
    • ►  May (18)
    • ►  April (12)
    • ►  March (17)
    • ►  February (15)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile